Screener
GPZ vs CCOR
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- GPZ costs 0.89% less per year.
- GPZ is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GPZ is classified as equity, while CCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GPZ follows a index tracking strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $28M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.08% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and CCOR
Explore further