Screener
GPZ vs CGGR
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs Capital Group Growth ETF
Key differences
- CGGR is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GPZ follows a index tracking strategy; CGGR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | CGGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $22.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +22.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.28% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -28.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and CGGR
Explore further