Screener
GPZ vs FESM
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- FESM costs 0.12% less per year.
- FESM is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GPZ follows a index tracking strategy; FESM uses index enhanced.
- FESM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | FESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $5.0B |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +52.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.05% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -26.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and FESM
Explore further