Screener
GPZ vs LFEQ
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
Key differences
- GPZ costs 0.18% less per year.
- GPZ is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GPZ is classified as equity, while LFEQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GPZ follows a index tracking strategy; LFEQ uses tactical allocation.
- LFEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | LFEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $29M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.13% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -35.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and LFEQ
Explore further