Screener
GPZ vs PY
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs Principal Value ETF
Key differences
- PY costs 0.25% less per year.
- GPZ follows a index tracking strategy; PY uses active selection.
- PY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | PY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $212M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +17.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.72% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -45.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and PY
Explore further