Screener
GPZ vs VO
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VO costs 0.37% less per year.
- VO is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $213.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +18.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.42% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -39.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and VO
Explore further