Screener
GPZ vs VOO
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Key differences
- VOO costs 0.37% less per year.
- VOO is significantly larger than GPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | VOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $1.6T |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.97% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -33.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and VOO
Explore further