Screener
GPZ vs VPC
VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF vs Virtus Private Credit ETF
Key differences
- GPZ costs 10.20% less per year.
- GPZ is significantly larger than VPC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VPC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GPZ | VPC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 10.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $33M |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 16.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -10.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.06% |
| Max drawdown | -31.72% | -53.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GPZ and VPC
Explore further