Screener
GQQQ vs MANI
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF vs Man Active Income ETF
Key differences
- GQQQ is classified as equity, while MANI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GQQQ follows a active selection strategy; MANI uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| GQQQ | MANI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $130M | — |
| Since | 2024 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.36% | -0.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GQQQ and MANI
Explore further