Screener
GRW vs ACSG
TCW Durable Growth ETF vs American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
Key differences
Both GRW and ACSG are equity ETFs. GRW charges 0.75% a year and ACSG 0.49%. The main difference: ACSG costs 0.26% less per year.
- ACSG costs 0.26% less per year.
- GRW is much larger than ACSG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GRW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GRW | ACSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $17M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.26% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -8.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.05% | — |
| Max drawdown | -23.84% | -13.28% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.