Screener
GRW vs CAML
TCW Durable Growth ETF vs Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
Both GRW and CAML are equity ETFs. GRW charges 0.75% a year and CAML 0.65%. The main difference: CAML costs 0.10% less per year.
- CAML costs 0.10% less per year.
- CAML is much larger than GRW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GRW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GRW | CAML | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $386M |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.26% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -8.9% | +12.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.05% | 15.14% |
| Max drawdown | -23.84% | -21.06% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.