Skip to content
Screener

GRW vs DCOR

TCW Durable Growth ETF vs Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF

GRW

TCW Durable Growth ETF

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$72M

DCOR

Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF

Annual cost

0.14%

Fund size

$3.1B

Key differences

GRW is an equity ETF, while DCOR is an alternative ETF. GRW charges 0.75% a year and DCOR 0.14%.

  • GRW is an equity fund, while DCOR is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • GRW follows a active selection strategy; DCOR uses multi strategy.
  • DCOR costs 0.61% less per year.
  • DCOR is much larger than GRW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • GRW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GRWDCOR
Annual cost (TER)0.75%0.14%
Fund size (AUM)$72M$3.1B
Since20162023
Dividend yield0.26%0.91%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionmulti strategy
CAGR 1Y-9.5%+26.4%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y14.67%12.09%
Max drawdown-23.84%-19.10%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to GRW and DCOR