Skip to content
Screener

GRW vs DFAX

TCW Durable Growth ETF vs Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF

GRW

TCW Durable Growth ETF

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$72M

DFAX

Dimensional World ex U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF

Annual cost

0.28%

Fund size

$12.1B

Key differences

Both GRW and DFAX are equity ETFs. GRW charges 0.75% a year and DFAX 0.28%. The main difference: DFAX costs 0.47% less per year.

  • DFAX costs 0.47% less per year.
  • DFAX is much larger than GRW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • DFAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GRWDFAX
Annual cost (TER)0.75%0.28%
Fund size (AUM)$72M$12.1B
Since20162008
Dividend yield0.26%2.21%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobal ex us
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y-8.9%+31.7%
CAGR 3YN/A+20.8%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A1.10
Volatility 1Y15.05%15.74%
Max drawdown-23.84%-28.15%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to GRW and DFAX