Screener
GRW vs FAD
TCW Durable Growth ETF vs First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
Both GRW and FAD are equity ETFs. GRW charges 0.75% a year and FAD 0.63%. The main difference: GRW follows a active selection strategy; FAD uses index enhanced.
- GRW follows a active selection strategy; FAD uses index enhanced.
- FAD costs 0.12% less per year.
- FAD is much larger than GRW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FAD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GRW | FAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $536M |
| Since | 2016 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.26% | 0.09% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | -8.9% | +34.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.05% | 19.42% |
| Max drawdown | -23.84% | -37.25% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.