Screener
GRW vs FELV
TCW Durable Growth ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF
Key differences
Both GRW and FELV are equity ETFs. GRW charges 0.75% a year and FELV 0.18%. The main difference: GRW follows a active selection strategy; FELV uses index tracking.
- GRW follows a active selection strategy; FELV uses index tracking.
- FELV costs 0.57% less per year.
- FELV is much larger than GRW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- FELV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GRW | FELV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2016 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.26% | 1.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -8.9% | +30.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.05% | 11.16% |
| Max drawdown | -23.84% | -16.08% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.