Screener
GSC vs GIGB
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- GIGB costs 0.67% less per year.
- GIGB is significantly larger than GSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSC is classified as equity, while GIGB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- GSC follows a active selection strategy; GIGB uses index tracking.
- GIGB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSC | GIGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $243M | $907M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 4.70% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.19% | 4.42% |
| Max drawdown | -26.63% | -22.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSC and GIGB
Explore further