Screener
GSGO vs FAD
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- GSGO costs 0.18% less per year.
- GSGO follows a active selection strategy; FAD uses index tracking.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSGO | FAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $480M |
| Since | 1999 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +37.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.54% |
| Max drawdown | -13.88% | -37.25% |
Similar to GSGO and FAD
Explore further