Screener
GSGO vs FDG
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSGO | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $387M |
| Since | 1999 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +35.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +32.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.88% |
| Max drawdown | -13.88% | -43.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSGO and FDG
Explore further