Screener
GSGO vs GXUS
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF
Key differences
- GXUS costs 0.27% less per year.
- GXUS is significantly larger than GSGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSGO covers north america markets; GXUS covers global.
- GSGO follows a active selection strategy; GXUS uses index tracking.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSGO | GXUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $607M |
| Since | 1999 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +32.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.35% |
| Max drawdown | -13.88% | -13.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSGO and GXUS
Explore further