Screener
GSGO vs IMCG
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- IMCG costs 0.39% less per year.
- IMCG is significantly larger than GSGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSGO follows a active selection strategy; IMCG uses index tracking.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSGO | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $3.5B |
| Since | 1999 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +20.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.45% |
| Max drawdown | -13.88% | -35.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSGO and IMCG
Explore further