Screener
GSGO vs NBGX
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs Neuberger Growth ETF
Key differences
- GSGO is significantly larger than NBGX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSGO is classified as equity, while NBGX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GSGO follows a active selection strategy; NBGX uses option income.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSGO | NBGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $14M |
| Since | 1999 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.27% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.30% |
| Max drawdown | -13.88% | -21.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSGO and NBGX
Explore further