Screener
GSGO vs SAMT
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- GSGO costs 0.21% less per year.
- SAMT is significantly larger than GSGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSGO is classified as equity, while SAMT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GSGO follows a active selection strategy; SAMT uses tactical allocation.
- GSGO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSGO | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $619M |
| Since | 1999 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +46.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.65% |
| Max drawdown | -13.88% | -20.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSGO and SAMT
Explore further