Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GSJY vs JAVA

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF vs JPMorgan Active Value ETF

GSJY

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.25%

Fund size

$84M

JAVA

JPMorgan Active Value ETF

Annual cost

0.44%

Fund size

$6.5B

Key differences

Both GSJY and JAVA are equity ETFs. GSJY charges 0.25% a year and JAVA 0.44%. The main difference: GSJY follows a index tracking strategy; JAVA uses active selection.

  • GSJY follows a index tracking strategy; JAVA uses active selection.
  • GSJY covers the Asia-Pacific region; JAVA covers North America.
  • GSJY costs 0.19% less per year.
  • JAVA is much larger than GSJY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, GSJY has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • GSJY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

GSJYJAVA
Annual cost (TER)0.25%0.44%
Fund size (AUM)$84M$6.5B
Since20162021
Dividend yield1.75%1.25%
Asset classequityequity
Regionasia pacificnorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+25.9%+23.4%
CAGR 3Y+18.4%+17.2%
CAGR 5Y+8.4%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.801.02
Volatility 1Y19.75%11.33%
Max drawdown-32.53%-16.54%

Similar to GSJY and JAVA