Screener
GSLC vs FORH
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF vs Formidable ETF
Key differences
- GSLC costs 1.10% less per year.
- GSLC is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSLC is classified as equity, while FORH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GSLC follows a index enhanced strategy; FORH uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, GSLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GSLC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSLC | FORH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 1.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15.0B | $20M |
| Since | 2015 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index enhanced | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.3% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.2% | +2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 0.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.85% | 15.64% |
| Max drawdown | -33.69% | -20.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSLC and FORH
Explore further