Screener
GSSC vs BASG
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF vs Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF
Key differences
- GSSC costs 0.41% less per year.
- GSSC covers north america markets; BASG covers global.
- GSSC follows a index tracking strategy; BASG uses active selection.
- GSSC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSSC | BASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $952M | $467M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.69% | — |
| Max drawdown | -41.38% | -19.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSSC and BASG
Explore further