Screener
GSSC vs LRGF
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF vs iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- LRGF costs 0.12% less per year.
- LRGF is significantly larger than GSSC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSSC follows a index tracking strategy; LRGF uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, LRGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSSC | LRGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $952M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2017 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | 1.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.9% | +25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | +13.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.61% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -41.38% | -36.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSSC and LRGF
Explore further