Screener
GSST vs GBND
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Bond ETF vs Goldman Sachs Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- GSST costs 0.09% less per year.
- GSST is significantly larger than GBND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSST follows a index tracking strategy; GBND uses active selection.
- GSST has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSST | GBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $480M |
| Since | 2019 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.40% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.95 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.58% | — |
| Max drawdown | -3.51% | -2.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSST and GBND
Explore further