Screener
GSY vs PULS
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF vs PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Key differences
- PULS costs 0.07% less per year.
- PULS is significantly larger than GSY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSY follows a index tracking strategy; PULS uses active selection.
- GSY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSY | PULS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.5B | $15.7B |
| Since | 2008 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.38% | 5.02% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.6% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.5% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.6% | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 3.45 | 3.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.40% | 0.42% |
| Max drawdown | -5.25% | -5.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSY and PULS
Explore further