Screener
GSY vs SCUS
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF vs Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF
Key differences
- SCUS costs 0.08% less per year.
- GSY is significantly larger than SCUS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GSY follows a index tracking strategy; SCUS uses active selection.
- GSY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GSY | SCUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.5B | $224M |
| Since | 2008 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.38% | 4.03% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.6% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 3.35 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.40% | 0.66% |
| Max drawdown | -5.25% | -0.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GSY and SCUS
Explore further