Screener
GTO vs BLV
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF vs Vanguard Long-Term Bond Fund
Key differences
- BLV costs 0.32% less per year.
- BLV is significantly larger than GTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTO follows a active selection strategy; BLV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GTO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTO | BLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $8.5B |
| Since | 2016 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 4.75% | 4.77% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | +2.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.2% | -2.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | -0.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.47% | 8.32% |
| Max drawdown | -20.75% | -38.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTO and BLV
Explore further