Screener
GTO vs VCOB
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF vs Voya Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- VCOB costs 0.10% less per year.
- GTO is significantly larger than VCOB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTO is classified as fixed income, while VCOB is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GTO follows a active selection strategy; VCOB uses multi strategy.
- GTO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTO | VCOB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $107M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.75% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.47% | — |
| Max drawdown | -20.75% | -3.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTO and VCOB
Explore further