Screener
GTOC vs BKLN
Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF vs Invesco Senior Loan ETF
Key differences
- GTOC costs 0.39% less per year.
- BKLN is significantly larger than GTOC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTOC follows a active selection strategy; BKLN uses index tracking.
- BKLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTOC | BKLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $188M | $6.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.91% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.75% |
| Max drawdown | -2.70% | -24.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTOC and BKLN
Explore further