Screener
GTOQ vs BLV
Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF vs Vanguard Long-Term Bond Fund
Key differences
- BLV costs 0.36% less per year.
- BLV is significantly larger than GTOQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTOQ is classified as alternative, while BLV is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- GTOQ follows a multi strategy strategy; BLV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GTOQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTOQ | BLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $162M | $8.5B |
| Since | 2020 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 6.92% | 4.77% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.6% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +2.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | -2.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | -0.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.69% | 8.32% |
| Max drawdown | -15.96% | -38.29% |
Similar to GTOQ and BLV
Explore further