Screener
GTOQ vs PFIG
Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF vs Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- PFIG costs 0.17% less per year.
- GTOQ is classified as alternative, while PFIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- GTOQ follows a multi strategy strategy; PFIG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, GTOQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PFIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTOQ | PFIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $162M | $113M |
| Since | 2020 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 6.92% | 4.37% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.0% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.0% | +1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.76% | 3.10% |
| Max drawdown | -15.96% | -15.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTOQ and PFIG
Explore further