Screener
GTOQ vs SCCR
Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF vs Schwab Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- SCCR costs 0.23% less per year.
- SCCR is significantly larger than GTOQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GTOQ is classified as alternative, while SCCR is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- GTOQ follows a multi strategy strategy; SCCR uses active selection.
- GTOQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GTOQ | SCCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $162M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 6.92% | 4.47% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.6% | +6.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.69% | 3.84% |
| Max drawdown | -15.96% | -2.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GTOQ and SCCR
Explore further