Screener
GUMI vs CGMU
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- GUMI costs 0.11% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than GUMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GUMI follows a active selection strategy; CGMU uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GUMI | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.81% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.2% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.09% | 2.28% |
| Max drawdown | -0.48% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GUMI and CGMU
Explore further