Screener
GUMI vs FTMA
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF vs Franklin Massachusetts Municipal Inc ETF
Key differences
- GUMI costs 0.19% less per year.
- FTMA is significantly larger than GUMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GUMI follows a active selection strategy; FTMA uses index tracking.
- FTMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GUMI | FTMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $273M |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.81% | 3.15% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.09% | — |
| Max drawdown | -0.48% | -2.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GUMI and FTMA
Explore further