Screener
GUMI vs ICSH
Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
Both GUMI and ICSH are fixed income ETFs. GUMI charges 0.16% a year and ICSH 0.08%. The main difference: ICSH costs 0.08% less per year.
- ICSH costs 0.08% less per year.
- ICSH is much larger than GUMI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- ICSH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GUMI | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $40M | $7.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.80% | 4.38% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.2% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 3.37 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.09% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -0.48% | -3.94% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.