Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GUMI vs SCUS

Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF vs Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF

GUMI

Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF

Goldman Sachs

Annual cost

0.16%

Fund size

$38M

SCUS

Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF

Schwab ETFs

Annual cost

0.14%

Fund size

$224M

Key differences

  • SCUS is significantly larger than GUMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

GUMISCUS
Annual cost (TER)0.16%0.14%
Fund size (AUM)$38M$224M
Since20242024
Dividend yield2.81%4.03%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+3.2%+4.3%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y1.09%0.66%
Max drawdown-0.48%-0.17%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to GUMI and SCUS