Screener
GUSE vs FEAC
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- FEAC costs 0.12% less per year.
- GUSE is significantly larger than FEAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GUSE follows a active selection strategy; FEAC uses index tracking.
- GUSE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GUSE | FEAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $341M | $12M |
| Since | 2008 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.61% |
| Max drawdown | -8.54% | -18.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GUSE and FEAC
Explore further