Screener
GVAL vs GEW
Cambria Global Value ETF vs Cambria Global EW ETF
Key differences
- GEW costs 0.36% less per year.
- GVAL is significantly larger than GEW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GVAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GVAL | GEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $541M | $144M |
| Since | 2014 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.89% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.47% | — |
| Max drawdown | -47.79% | -8.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GVAL and GEW
Explore further