Screener
GVI vs SCHQ
iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF vs Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SCHQ costs 0.17% less per year.
- GVI is significantly larger than SCHQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, GVI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GVI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GVI | SCHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.8B | $897M |
| Since | 2007 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 3.56% | 4.76% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.3% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | -1.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.0% | -5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.12 | -0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.52% | 9.07% |
| Max drawdown | -12.93% | -46.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GVI and SCHQ
Explore further