Screener
GVLE vs KONG
Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF
Key differences
- GVLE costs 0.44% less per year.
- GVLE is classified as equity, while KONG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- GVLE follows a active selection strategy; KONG uses option income.
- GVLE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GVLE | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $22M |
| Since | 2015 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.48 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.90% |
| Max drawdown | -7.88% | -19.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GVLE and KONG
Explore further