Screener
GXIG vs CGMU
Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- GXIG costs 0.12% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than GXIG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GXIG follows a active selection strategy; CGMU uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| GXIG | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $175M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.35% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.28% |
| Max drawdown | -3.19% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GXIG and CGMU
Explore further