Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

GXLC vs RYLD

Global X U.S. 500 ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

GXLC

Global X U.S. 500 ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

RYLD

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$1.3B

Key differences

  • GXLC is classified as equity, while RYLD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • GXLC follows a index tracking strategy; RYLD uses option income.

Side-by-side comparison

GXLCRYLD
Annual cost (TER)0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$1.3B
Since2019
Dividend yield11.85%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingoption income
CAGR 1YN/A+24.2%
CAGR 3YN/A+8.0%
CAGR 5YN/A+3.3%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.39
Volatility 1Y10.84%
Max drawdown-9.08%-41.52%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to GXLC and RYLD