Screener
GXPC vs HERO
Global X Purecap MSCI Communication Services ETF vs Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
Key differences
- GXPC costs 0.35% less per year.
- HERO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GXPC | HERO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $77M | $71M |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -10.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.61% |
| Max drawdown | -16.59% | -54.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GXPC and HERO
Explore further