Screener
GXPE vs IGF
Global X Purecap MSCI Energy ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- GXPE costs 0.24% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than GXPE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GXPE covers north america markets; IGF covers global.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GXPE | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $10.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.43% |
| Max drawdown | -12.37% | -42.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GXPE and IGF
Explore further