Screener
GXPE vs MILN
Global X Purecap MSCI Energy ETF vs Global X Millennials Consumer ETF
Key differences
- GXPE costs 0.35% less per year.
- MILN is significantly larger than GXPE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MILN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GXPE | MILN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $99M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.07% |
| Max drawdown | -12.37% | -44.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GXPE and MILN
Explore further