Screener
HACK vs UCYB
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF vs ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cybersecurity
Key differences
- HACK costs 0.35% less per year.
- HACK is significantly larger than UCYB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HACK follows a index tracking strategy; UCYB uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, UCYB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HACK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HACK | UCYB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $4M |
| Since | 2014 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.08% | 2.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.4% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.9% | +38.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.6% | +14.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.04% | 46.16% |
| Max drawdown | -38.68% | -62.87% |
Similar to HACK and UCYB
Explore further