Screener
HAKY vs IPAY
Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Covered Call ETF vs Amplify Digital Payments ETF
Key differences
- HAKY costs 0.10% less per year.
- IPAY is significantly larger than HAKY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HAKY is classified as alternative, while IPAY is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- HAKY follows a option income strategy; IPAY uses index tracking.
- IPAY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| HAKY | IPAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $174M |
| Since | 2026 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.87% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -18.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -7.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 23.27% |
| Max drawdown | -13.12% | -51.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HAKY and IPAY
Explore further